rejecting an interpretation of La. R.S. 17:439(A) by the appellate courts that would render the statute meaningless and leád to absurd results as violating settled rules of statutory construction
How later courts described this case
- rejecting an interpretation of La. R.S. 17:439(A) by the appellate courts that would render the statute meaningless and leád to absurd results as violating settled rules of statutory construction
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
KIMBALL, C. J.,
dissents in part.
I dissent in part from the majority opinion for the reasons assigned by Justice Weimer.