Opinion

Gunderson v. F.A. Richard & Associates

  • 9 La.App. 3 Cir. 01498
  • 44 So. 3d 779
  • 2010 La. App. LEXIS 1199
  • 2010 WL 2594287
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Filed
Aug 25, 2010
Status
Published
Author
Cooks
On the bench
Cooks, Ezell, Painter
Cited by
22 cases

holding that companies that act as middlemen do not provide health benefits and are therefore not exempt under La. R.S. 40:2203.1(A)

How later courts described this case

  • holding that companies that act as middlemen do not provide health benefits and are therefore not exempt under La. R.S. 40:2203.1(A)

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

COOKS, J.,

on rehearing.

hi have examined the record again. After re-checking the record there is nothing in it suggesting that the Order of Appeal *792 was signed before the Summary Judgment was signed by the trial court. Defendant’s brief acknowledges in footnote 10 that there is no way to determine from this record the order in which the trial court signed the Order of Appeal and the Summary Judgment. See also La. C.C.P. art 2088(A)(7).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.