explaining that facts or data used to support the opinion expressed “need not be admissible in evidence if they are of the type reasonably relied upon by experts in the subject”
How later courts described this case
- explaining that facts or data used to support the opinion expressed “need not be admissible in evidence if they are of the type reasonably relied upon by experts in the subject”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
TORPY, J.,
concurring.
I fully concur with the majority opinion. I write to point out that, though not argued here or below, a fact issue was clearly presented through the deposition of Appellant, who gave his own opinion of value as the owner of the property.