Opinion

Capitol House Preservation Co. v. Perryman Consultants, Inc.

2008 La.App. 1 Cir. 0367
47 So. 3d 408
2009 La. App. LEXIS 1551
2009 WL 2900764

Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Filed: Aug 28, 2009
Status: Published
Author: Pettigrew
On the bench: Parro, Pettigrew, Welch
Cited by: 5 cases
Authority: More cited than 11.0%

The opinion

PETTIGREW, J.,

concurring.

|,I have concerns about reversing a judgment reflecting a verdict of the jury. I am further of the opinion that the Noerr-Pennington doctrine should not be interpreted broadly and should only apply in the context of Sherman antitrust litigation.. However, I do note the recent case cited by the majority of Astoria Entm’t, Inc. v. Debartolo, 08-1690 (La.5/22/09), 12 So.3d 956 , decided by the Louisiana Supreme Court; and I am constrained to follow same.

For these reasons and, considering the unique facts of this case, I will concur with the majority.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.