Opinion

State Ex Rel. Board of Regents v. Livingston

  • 76 O.B.A.J. 1045
  • 111 P.3d 734
  • 57 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 193
  • 2005 OK CIV APP 25
  • 2005 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 10
Court
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Filed
Mar 17, 2005
Status
Published
Author
Buettner
On the bench
Carol M. Hansen
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 11.0%

The opinion

KENNETH L. BUETTNER, Chief Judge,

dissenting:

¶ 20 The Oklahoma Constitution, Article 5, § 53, provides that no statute of limitations will bar collection of an indebtedness owed to the state. The University of Oklahoma is a constitutionally created state agency. Article XIII, § 8, Oklahoma Constitution. Where a state agency is acting in its sovereign capacity to vindicate public rights, then § 53 of the Constitution applies. Collecting state funded educational loans is the enforcement of a public right. State ex rel. Oklahoma Student Loan Authority v. Akers, 1995 OK CIV APP 75 , 900 P.2d 468 . There is no functional difference between the Oklahoma Student Loan Authority collecting student loans and the University collecting student loans.

¶21 The gift of money to the University became the property of the University. 70 Okla. Stat.2001 § 3209. When the University sought to recover its loaned funds from the Defendant, it was operating in its sovereign capacity to enforce a public right, and the Oklahoma Constitution protected it from application of a statute of limitations.

¶ 22 I respectfully dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.