Opinion

Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corporation

  • 79 So. 3d 246
Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Filed
Oct 26, 2011
Status
Published
Author
Victory
On the bench
Lobrano, Knoll, Johnson, Victory, Weimer, Guidry, Clark
Cited by
95 cases

“whether damage to the property is apparent or not, the personal nature of the right of the landowner at that time does not change, and remains with the landowner unless the right is explicitly assigned or subrogated to another”

How later courts described this case

  • “whether damage to the property is apparent or not, the personal nature of the right of the landowner at that time does not change, and remains with the landowner unless the right is explicitly assigned or subrogated to another”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

VICTORY, J.,

concurring in the result.

hi agree with the majority’s conclusion that, under Louisiana law, a subsequent purchaser of property does not have the right to sue a third party for non-apparent property damages inflicted before the sale in the absence of an assignment of or subrogation to that right.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.