holding, based upon prior arrests and incarcerations, the accused was familiar with his Sixth -5- 09-00349-CR Amendment rights, and specifically waived his right to counsel
How later courts described this case
- holding, based upon prior arrests and incarcerations, the accused was familiar with his Sixth -5- 09-00349-CR Amendment rights, and specifically waived his right to counsel
- holding that defendant has no standing to complain of an illegal search of another’s residence
- remanding to give defendant opportunity to show harm under new theory applied, by appellate court, from case law decided after trial in this case
- differing procedures of jury voir dire in capital and non-capital cases does not violate federal equal protection
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
McCORMICK, J.,
concurs in the result of Point of Error one, and joins the remainder of the opinion.