The opinion
Conley Byrd, Justice, concurring.
Because of the testimony of Mrs. Smith and Mr. Alexander I cannot say that the chancellor was in error in finding that Mr. Arnold fraudulently overreached appellee in procuring the antenuptial agreement. However, I take this occasion to point out that our laws on antenuptial agreements especially among persons beyond the child bearing age — need a substantial revision in view of the educational and business acumen of the present day woman.
For the reasons stated I concur in the result of the majority.
Harris, C.J., joins in this concurrence.