Opinion

Railroad Com'n of Texas v. Lone Star Gas Co.

  • 36 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 436
  • 844 S.W.2d 679
  • 117 Oil & Gas Rep. 168
  • 1992 Tex. LEXIS 188
  • 1992 WL 388115
Court
Texas Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 31, 1992
Status
Published
Author
Cook
On the bench
Hightower, Motion, Cook, Doggett, Gammage
Cited by
214 cases

stating that an agency ‘See TelephoneConversation withPaulD. Cook,AssistantExecutiveDirector,TexasBoardof Professional Engineers(Sept. 14,2004). Ms. Dale Beebe Farrow - Page 4 (GA-0274) may adopt “‘only such rules as are authorized by and consistent with its statutory authority”‘

How later courts described this case

  • stating that an agency ‘See TelephoneConversation withPaulD. Cook,AssistantExecutiveDirector,TexasBoardof Professional Engineers(Sept. 14,2004). Ms. Dale Beebe Farrow - Page 4 (GA-0274) may adopt “‘only such rules as are authorized by and consistent with its statutory authority”‘
  • determining factor whether particular administrative agency has exceeded its rule-making powers is “that the rule’s provisions must be in harmony with the general objectives of the Act involved.”
  • determining factor whether particular administrative agency has exceeded its rule-making powers is “that the rale’s provisions must be in harmony with the general objectives of the Act involved.”
  • noting that agency has “informed discretion” in making decision to proceed via rulemaking or ad hoc adjudication but stating that rulemaking should be utilized except “‘[when] there is a danger that its use would frustrate the effective accomplishment of the agency’s function”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

COOK, Justice,

concurring.

I join the court’s opinion and judgment in this cause. I also write for the following reasons.

As I leave the bench, I hope and pray that each of us who occupies these seats, whether on the district court, the court of appeals or the supreme court will always remember that which is expected of us.

We are merely the temporary guardians of the courts over which we preside. These courts in turn are part of our larger system of justice. These courts are an institution, and we as judges are charged with the responsibility of protecting the dignity of our courts and our profession.

To the attorneys who appear in front of us we have an obligation to treat them with respect, to listen to their arguments, to inform ourselves of the law and to be fair and impartial.

Each of us, whether lawyer or judge, is part of the legal profession. We must never allow ourselves to forget this and our solemn duty to conduct ourselves in a manner that always reflects honor on the profession of law. To that end we must consecrate our minds, our hearts and our very souls.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.