Opinion

Anderson v. Cinnamon

  • 365 Mo. 304
  • 282 S.W.2d 445
  • 55 A.L.R. 2d 516
  • 1955 Mo. LEXIS 585
Court
Supreme Court of Missouri
Filed
Sep 12, 1955
Status
Published
Author
Westhues
On the bench
Westhues, Leecly, Dalton, Eager, Storelcman, Hollingsworth, Westilices
Cited by
34 cases

Overruled on other grounds by Wells v. Goforth, 1969 Mo. LEXIS 823 (1969)

overruled on other grounds by Wells v. Goforth, 443 S.W.2d 155 (Mo. banc 1969)

How later courts described this case

  • overruled on other grounds by Wells v. Goforth, 443 S.W.2d 155 (Mo. banc 1969)
  • involving the same fire as the one here in question
  • failure to warn fireman of defective porch held insufficient to impose liability

Written by the judges who cited it.

Later courts went against this

  • Overruled on other grounds by Wells v. Goforth, 1969 Mo. LEXIS 823 (1969)

    365 Mo. 304, 282 S.W.2d 445, 446-47 (1955), overruled on other grounds by Wells v. Goforth, 443 S.W.2d 155 (Mo. banc 1969).
    Supreme Court of MissouriJun 9, 1969other groundsmedium confidenceRead it

The opinion

WESTHUES,

J. (dissenting) I cannot concur in the result reached in the opinion prepared by Judge Hyde in this case. In the conclusion, it is stated, “We limit our decision to holding, where it is not alleged that the possessor of land was informed that fireman intended to enter and use the porch of his building with their fire fighting equipment before they went on it, he cannot be held liable for failure to warn them to leave it after he knew of their presence there.” (Emphasis supplied)

*313 To say that a property owner would be liable if be failed to warn firemen if be bad opportunity to do so before tbe firemen went onto a porcb tbat be knew was likely to fall, and not be liable for failure to warn after tbe firemen bad entered upon tbe porcb, is to draw a distinction where no difference exists. In other words, tbe opinion of Judge Hyde bolds that a property owner may stand idly by while firemen who are on a defective porcb fall to their death or great injury and not be liable even though a warning would have saved tbe firemen; but, if tbe owner has notice of tbe firemen’s preparing to go onto the defective porcb and fails to warn, then be will be liable. In my bumble opinion, tbe petition in this case states a cause of action. Tbe question of fact, tbat is, whether Barney Cinnamon had knowledge of tbe weakness of tbe porcb and whether after tbe firemen entered upon the porcb, Cinnamon bad time to warn, should be determined by a jury.

I respectfully dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.