Opinion

Graham v. State

  • 547 S.W.2d 531
  • 1977 Tenn. LEXIS 557
Court
Tennessee Supreme Court
Filed
Jan 31, 1977
Status
Published
Author
Henry
On the bench
Henry, Cooper, Fones, Brock, Harbison
Cited by
170 cases

adopting the Model Penal Code insanity defense which included lack- mg “substantial capacity ... to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law”

How later courts described this case

  • adopting the Model Penal Code insanity defense which included lack- mg “substantial capacity ... to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law”
  • Generally, business records are admissible when introduced in the proper manner and with the proper foundation, and questions regarding the qualifications of the individual preparing the record go to weight and not admissibility.
  • an indigent does not have a constitutional right to the services of a private psychiatrist at state expense

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

OPINION ON PETITION TO REHEAR

HENRY, Justice.

The petition of the State of Tennessee for a rehearing is respectfully denied. Nothing in this opinion is subject to the construction that all cases wherein an insanity defense was interposed will ipso facto be subject to retrial.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.