holding that, “to ensure that [this Court] review[s] only decisions of the courts of appeals, we insist that the parties, in an orderly and timely fashion, provide the courts of appeals with the first opportunity to resolve the various issues associated with the appeal”
How later courts described this case
- holding that, “to ensure that [this Court] review[s] only decisions of the courts of appeals, we insist that the parties, in an orderly and timely fashion, provide the courts of appeals with the first opportunity to resolve the various issues associated with the appeal”
- holding that this Court’s review is limited to decisions by the courts of appeals
- stating this Court's review limited to decisions of the courts of appeals
- "to ensure that [this Court] reviews only decisions of the courts of appeals, we insist that the parties, in an orderly and timely fashion, provide the courts of appeals with the first opportunity to resolve the various issues associated with the appeal"
Written by the judges who cited it.
Later courts went against this
Overruled on other grounds by Angleton v. State, 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 70 (1998)
864 S.W.2d 501 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993), overruled on other grounds by Angleton v. State, 971 S.W.2d 65, 69
The opinion
CAMPBELL, J.,
concurs in the result only, believing this case was improvidently granted in the first instance.
McCORMICK, P.J., joined by WHITE and MEYERS, JJ., dissents.
CLINTON, J., not participating.