stating that reference to the taking of a polygraph test by people other than the defendant does not constitute reversible error
How later courts described this case
- stating that reference to the taking of a polygraph test by people other than the defendant does not constitute reversible error
- statement that two persons submitting to investigation had been tested
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
DISSENTING OPINION
MORRISON, Judge.
I join in that portion of my brother Onion’s dissent in which he concludes that the requirements of the holding of the Supreme Court of the United States in Miranda v. State of Arizona, supra, have not been met.