Opinion

Badgett v. Rogers

  • 222 Tenn. 374
  • 26 McCanless 374
  • 436 S.W.2d 292
  • 1968 Tenn. LEXIS 438
Court
Tennessee Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 6, 1968
Status
Published
Author
Creson
On the bench
Creson, Burnett, Chiee, Dyes, Chatttn, Humphreys, Dyer, Chattin
Cited by
20 cases

determining that because a prior demand would have been a “vain formality,” citizen taxpayers had standing to challenge a $3,000 stipend to the mayor, *429 who had “patently” contrary interests, for expenses as a misuse of public funds

How later courts described this case

  • determining that because a prior demand would have been a “vain formality,” citizen taxpayers had standing to challenge a $3,000 stipend to the mayor, *429 who had “patently” contrary interests, for expenses as a misuse of public funds
  • stating that taxpayers may proceed with a lawsuit alleging an illegal use of public funds even though they are unable to establish an injury different from that sustained by the public at large
  • requiring “demand upon public authorities to rectify the alleged wrong prior to the initiation of such action by the citizen and taxpayer”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Opinion on Petition to Rehear.

MR. Justice Creson.

A petition to rehear has been, filed in this cause, the thrust of which is that the Court overlooked the facts (1) that the case was before the Court upon a demurrer to the original bill, and (2) that certain allegations of the bill alleged “facts” showing the iniquity or even worse, of the conduct of the defendants.

It is true that the ease is here seeking review of a judgment of the Knox County Chancery Court sustaining a demurrer. In the original opinion, we did not agree with *383 the ground upon which the Chancellor based his decision, but did so, fully, with the result reached by him.

Counsel should recall that a large per cent of cases which come to this Court on direct appeal are those on demurrer; and the Court is fully familiar with the rules respecting review of such a case.

We feel it is entirely clear in the original opinion that the things this petition argues were overlooked were precisely the things that were considered in reaching the conclusion stated in the original opinion.

The petition to rehear is denied.

Burnett, Chief Justice, and Dyer, Chattin and HumphReys, Justices, concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.