Opinion

Commonwealth v. Sharp

  • 453 Pa. Super. 349
  • 683 A.2d 1219
  • 1996 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3212
Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Sep 20, 1996
Status
Published
Author
Saylor
On the bench
Popovich, Saylor, Eakin
Cited by
25 cases

disapproving issuance of a warrant by a district justice who was married to the chief officer investigating the case

How later courts described this case

  • disapproving issuance of a warrant by a district justice who was married to the chief officer investigating the case

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

SAYLOR, Judge,

concurring.

I join my colleagues in concluding that the search warrant at issue was invalid under the Supreme Court’s holding in Commonwealth v. Edmunds.

I also agree with Judge Popovich that the issuing magistrate should have disqualified herself in this proceeding because of her relationship with the sheriff who supervised the investigation and supplied information in connection with the application for the search warrant. However, I am unwilling to impute any actual bias to the magistrate by virtue of the fact that she issued a search warrant on the basis of an affidavit which was technically deficient. Rather I believe, as did Justice McDermott, dissenting in Edmunds, that “[A]ll concerned acted in good faith.”

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.