Opinion

Association of Pennsylvania State College & University Faculties v. State System of Higher Education

  • 505 Pa. 369
  • 479 A.2d 962
  • 5 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1788
  • 1984 Pa. LEXIS 304
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Jul 6, 1984
Status
Published
Author
Hutchinson
On the bench
Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDer-mott, Hutchinson, Zappala, Papadakos
Cited by
43 cases
Authority
More cited than 10.6%

amendment to retirement code increasing rate of employees’ contribution unconstitutionally impaired the contract rights of all existing members of the retirement system

How later courts described this case

  • amendment to retirement code increasing rate of employees’ contribution unconstitutionally impaired the contract rights of all existing members of the retirement system

Written by the judges who cited it.

Distinguished

  • Distinguished by Wingert v. State Employes' Retirement Board, 138 Pa. Commw. 43 (1991)

    505 Pa. 369, 479 A.2d 962 (1984), is inapposite.
    Commonwealth Court of PennsylvaniaApr 5, 1991Read it

The opinion

HUTCHINSON, Justice,

concurring and dissenting.

I continue to adhere to the views expressed by former Chief Justice O’Brien in his Opinion in Support of Denial of Summary Judgment in Catania v. Commonwealth, State Employees’ Retirement Board, 498 Pa. 684 , 450 A.2d 1342 (1982). Moreover, as the majority concedes, the result in this case would be the same under either of the views expressed in Catania . I therefore believe the majority’s attempt to adopt a so-called contract theory in this case on pensions is an unfortunate dictum.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.