Opinion

Dowling v. State

  • 885 S.W.2d 103
  • 1994 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 87
  • 1992 WL 278415
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Jun 29, 1994
Status
Published
Author
Maloney
On the bench
Miller, Maloney, Clinton, McCorhick, McCormick, White, Campbell, Maloney'S, Overstreet
Cited by
17 cases

recognizing that the 1989 legislative amendments would have this effect

How later courts described this case

  • recognizing that the 1989 legislative amendments would have this effect
  • op. on reh'g on court's motion
  • motion for rehearing granted, ease under submission
  • opinion on rehearing on court’s motion

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

MALONEY, J.,

concurs with note: Believing that my opinion on Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing on Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review correctly states the law and that we should not have granted rehearing on our own motion subsequently, I can only concur in the result reached here.

CAMPBELL, J., joins J. MALONEY’S note.

OVERSTREET, J., joins J. MALONEY’S note.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.