Opinion

Masloff v. Port Auth. of Allegheny Cty.

  • 531 Pa. 416
  • 613 A.2d 1186
  • 141 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2045
  • 1992 Pa. LEXIS 394
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Jul 29, 1992
Status
Published
Author
Nix
On the bench
Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Papadakos, Gappy
Cited by
17 cases

binding arbitration provision of Second Class County Port Authority Act, applicable where employer obtained injunction to prohibit strike, was inapplicable where third party vindicating different interests, sought and obtained injunction

How later courts described this case

  • binding arbitration provision of Second Class County Port Authority Act, applicable where employer obtained injunction to prohibit strike, was inapplicable where third party vindicating different interests, sought and obtained injunction

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

NIX, Chief Justice,

dissenting.

I join in Parts I, II and III of the dissenting opinion authored by Mr. Justice Larsen and, therefore, agree with the result reached therein.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.