“Each of these four kinds of disability is separate and distinct and is separately compensated for by different methods provided by the several sub-sections of [the statute]; and each of such provisions is independent and unrelated.”
How later courts described this case
- “Each of these four kinds of disability is separate and distinct and is separately compensated for by different methods provided by the several sub-sections of [the statute]; and each of such provisions is independent and unrelated.”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
On Petition to Rehear
Appellees reiterate their claim that they are entitled to have the compensation to appellant for ‘ ‘ (a) temporary total disability” credited on the compensation to him for
*474 “(d) permanent total disability”; that is, that he is not entitled to both, as held in our opinion.
The petition to rehear points out nothing new, no matter of fact or law overlooked, but is merely a re-argument of matters fully argued, and decided by the Court. The petition to rehear is denied at the cost of appellees-petitioners.