Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Johnson v. King

297 Pa. Super. 431
444 A.2d 108
1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3781

Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Filed: Apr 2, 1982
Status: Published
Author: Wickersham
On the bench: Cercone, Spaeth, Hester, Wickersham, Brosky, Johnson, Popovich, Disalle, Shertz
Cited by: 9 cases
Authority: More cited than 10.5%

court ignored fact that record did not indicate that civil support action was reinstated

How later courts described this case

court ignored fact that record did not indicate that civil support action was reinstated

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

WICKERSHAM, Judge,

dissenting:

For the reasons noted in Williams v. Wolfe, 297 Pa. Super. 270 , 443 A.2d 831 (1982) (Dissenting Opinion by Wicker-sham, J.) I respectfully dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.