Opinion

Schepps v. State

  • 432 S.W.2d 926
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
May 15, 1968
Status
Published
Author
Belcher
On the bench
Belcher, Dice, Morrison, Onion, Woodley
Cited by
35 cases

three of five justices concurring

How later courts described this case

  • three of five justices concurring
  • opinion on original submission
  • on motion for rehearing

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

BELCHER, Judge

(concurring).

I adhere to the holding that the refusal of the trial court to excise the hearsay statements in the principals’ confessions implicating the appellant was reversible error on the ground that the limiting charge could not possibly remove the injury and damage caused by such incriminating- statements and therefore deprived the appellant of a fair and impartial trial.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.