stating that information in NCIC reports is pure hearsay of a dubious degree of accuracy, prepared for purposes other than court use, contains information that is likely to be prejudicial under all circumstances, and is not the best evidence of matters that can be proven by reliable, documentary evidence
How later courts described this case
- stating that information in NCIC reports is pure hearsay of a dubious degree of accuracy, prepared for purposes other than court use, contains information that is likely to be prejudicial under all circumstances, and is not the best evidence of matters that can be proven by reliable, documentary evidence
- adopting the five-factor analysis enunciated in Judge v. State, 539 S.W.2d 340, 344 (Tenn.Crim.App. 1976)
- holding that the jury charge for the (i)(7) aggravating circumstance should have been limited to rape, robbery, and kidnapping
- considering the felony murder aggravating circumstance as a single aggravating circumstance when the murder occurred while the defendant was committing rape, *205 robbery, and kidnapping
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
OPINION ON PETITION TO REHEAR
FONES, Chief Justice.
A petition to rehear has been filed on behalf of defendant asserting several propositions that defendant assumes the Court overlooked. We have again considered those issues and arguments and again found them to be without merit.
The Petition to Rehear is denied.
COOPER, BROCK, HARBISON and DROWOTA, JJ., concur.