Opinion

State v. Brown

  • 670 S.W.2d 140
  • 1984 Mo. App. LEXIS 4573
Court
Missouri Court of Appeals
Filed
Apr 24, 1984
Status
Published
Author
Maus
On the bench
Prewitt, Maus, Hogan
Cited by
9 cases
Authority
More cited than 10.4%

The opinion

MAUS, Presiding Judge,

concurring.

I concur. However, I do not find it is necessary to determine if the defendant’s statement of recognition he was on parole is admissible upon the issue of the degree of his intoxication. The state impermissi-bly over-emphasized and used this statement to create prejudice against the defendant. Compare State v. Nickens, 403 S.W.2d 582 (Mo. banc 1966); State v. Willis, 602 S.W.2d 9 (Mo.App.1980); MAI-CR2d 3.60.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.