Opinion

Daley v. Zoning Hearing Board

  • 770 A.2d 815
  • 2001 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 249
Court
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Apr 10, 2001
Status
Published
Author
Colins
On the bench
Colins, Smith, Mirarchi
Cited by
11 cases

affirming the grant of a variance for additional parking where the need for such parking to make reasonable use of the property was created by changes in the surrounding neighborhood

How later courts described this case

  • affirming the grant of a variance for additional parking where the need for such parking to make reasonable use of the property was created by changes in the surrounding neighborhood

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

COLINS, Judge,

Dissenting.

I must respectfully dissent from the fine opinion proffered by the majority.

While it is clear that the Church is entitled to some relief from the zoning ordinances, such that they may be allowed additional parking, the reduction of the buffer zone from fifty feet to five feet is draconian.

The surrounding landowners are having the value, use, and enjoyment of their properties altered radically with no showing of necessity. The five-feet buffer zone is illusory.

I would reverse the trial court.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.