“[W]here a statutory limitation provision is not merely ‘one of general application spanning all similar actions, but rather, derives from a specific proviso within a statute giving rise to the right sought to be vindicated,’ a plaintiff must demonstrate that the action has been brought within the time limit I regardless of whether the provision is described as a statute of repose.” (citation omitted)
How later courts described this case
- “[W]here a statutory limitation provision is not merely ‘one of general application spanning all similar actions, but rather, derives from a specific proviso within a statute giving rise to the right sought to be vindicated,’ a plaintiff must demonstrate that the action has been brought within the time limit I regardless of whether the provision is described as a statute of repose.” (citation omitted)
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
*613
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 25th day of June, 2007, the order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.
Justice SAYLOR circulated a concurring statement in which Justice CASTILLE and BAER joined.