Opinion

E. J. McAleer & Co. v. Iceland Products, Inc.

  • 475 Pa. 610
  • 381 A.2d 441
  • 1977 Pa. LEXIS 935
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Dec 23, 1977
Status
Published
Author
Packel
On the bench
Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino, Packel
Cited by
79 cases

noting that this Court may affirm a lower court's decision on any basis, regardless of the specific basis on which the lower court relied

How later courts described this case

  • noting that this Court may affirm a lower court's decision on any basis, regardless of the specific basis on which the lower court relied
  • “We may, of course, affirm the decision of the trial court if the result is correct on any ground without regard to the grounds which the trial court itself relied upon.”
  • this Court may affirm decision below on other grounds
  • Supreme Court may affirm decision of any court below on any ground, without regard to the grounds on which the court below relied

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

PACKEL, Justice,

dissenting.

The trial court, in this controversy involving in excess of four million dollars, concluded that it was without authority *616 to grant leave to file exceptions nine days late. I agree with the majority holding that the court below had that authority. I dissent because the matter should have been remanded to the trial court to exercise its sound discretion in reviewing the facts as to the delay, in light of our determination that it has such authority.

ROBERTS, J., joins in this dissenting opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.