holding that one-half of wife’s irrevocable trust was non-marital to the extent that her interest was not yet vested
How later courts described this case
- holding that one-half of wife’s irrevocable trust was non-marital to the extent that her interest was not yet vested
- Superior Court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to remand case to trial court for revising valuation of marital assets relative to the date of distribution, even though assets were valued as of the date of separation, where Wife did not proffer up-dated values of the assets
- Trust fund settled on wife prior to marriage may not be considered for purpose of increase in value until the amount settled becomes vested in the wife
- portion of trust fund was not marital property where wife had no right to it during the marriage and it was not in exchange for marital property
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
ROLF LARSEN, Justice,
dissenting.
I dissent and would affirm the Superior Court Order.
PAPADAKOS, J., joins this dissenting statement.