Opinion

Broussard v. State

  • 68 S.W.3d 197
  • 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 250
  • 2001 WL 1691310
Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Jan 10, 2002
Status
Published
Author
Cohen
On the bench
Scott Brister
Cited by
27 cases

noting that, without new trial motion to create record of trial counsel’s reasons for actions, appellate court must presume actions were product of overall strategic design and reasonable

How later courts described this case

  • noting that, without new trial motion to create record of trial counsel’s reasons for actions, appellate court must presume actions were product of overall strategic design and reasonable
  • finding evidence insufficient to demonstrate counsel was ineffective for failing to file suppression motion based upon officers’ unannounced entry
  • finding evidence insufficient to demonstrate counsel ineffective for failing to file a suppression motion based upon officers= unannounced entry

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Justice COHEN,

dissenting from the decision on en banc consideration, joined by Justice SMITH.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.