Opinion

Cures Without Cloning v. Pund

  • 259 S.W.3d 76
  • 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 643
  • 2008 WL 1912474
Court
Missouri Court of Appeals
Filed
May 2, 2008
Status
Published
Author
Smart
On the bench
Howard, Smart, Hardwick
Cited by
25 cases

section 116.190.4 does not authorize the circuit court to remand the summary statement to the Secretary of State for rewriting the portions that cannot be certified

How later courts described this case

  • section 116.190.4 does not authorize the circuit court to remand the summary statement to the Secretary of State for rewriting the portions that cannot be certified
  • circuit court not authorized to rewrite entire summary statement because it found that one word was not fair and sufficient

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

JAMES M. SMART, Jr., J.,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

The standard of review calls for this court to determine whether the trial court misapplied the law. Once the trial court determines that the Secretary’s statement cannot be approved, the trial court can adjust the Secretary’s draft, or, if it determines it to be necessary, draft its own summary, seeking to comply with the requirements of law. See section 116.190 RSMo 2000.

I agree with my colleagues that the phrase “repeal the current ban on human cloning” would have been likely to confuse rather that to enlighten. I also agree with the majority’s ruling on the constitutional claims of the proponents of the amendment. I differ from my colleagues only in that, in my view, the trial court was justified in drafting her own summary in her effort to improve sufficiency and fairness.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.