Opinion

State Ex Rel. Lute v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

  • 218 S.W.3d 431
  • 2007 Mo. LEXIS 53
  • 2007 WL 1122059
Court
Supreme Court of Missouri
Filed
Apr 17, 2007
Status
Published
Author
Price
On the bench
Mary R. Russell
Cited by
4 cases

stating clemency "is 'a mere matter of grace' that the governor can exercise 'upon such conditions and with such restrictions and limitations as he may think proper'"

How later courts described this case

  • stating clemency "is 'a mere matter of grace' that the governor can exercise 'upon such conditions and with such restrictions and limitations as he may think proper'"
  • explaining the executive clemency process in Missouri

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

WILLIAM RAY PRICE, JR., Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

The Governor is granted the power of grace by article IV, section 7 of the Missouri Constitution. When exercised, this special power, by its very nature, deserves generous and not grudging respect.

I agree with the majority that the Governor’s commutations of Ms. Lute and Ms. Branch necessarily include consideration and forgiveness of the seriousness of the two women’s crimes, and, in Ms. Branch’s case, the fact that she used a weapon and excessive force and violence. To read these two documents of commutation otherwise would render them for all practical purposes meaningless and useless. To the extent that the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole refused parole to Ms. Lute and Ms. Branch for these reasons, they erred and infringed upon the power of the Governor. Consideration of the Governor’s subsequent affidavit is unnecessary in this regard.

Article IV, section 7, however, does not include the power to parole. This power and the determination of conditions upon which parole may be granted are left exclusively to the Board of Probation and Parole. To the extent that the Governor’s affidavit indicates his evaluation of specific factors of Ms. Lute’s suitability for parole, it encroached upon the sole authority of the Board and should not be considered for that reason.

Accordingly, I concur with the majority that the Board of Probation and Parole should promptly conduct hearings for Ms. Lute and Ms. Branch giving full effect to the Governor’s commutation. I would not, however, order more.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.