incidental benefit and lack of expectation by plaintiffs showed that benefit was not unjust
How later courts described this case
- incidental benefit and lack of expectation by plaintiffs showed that benefit was not unjust
Written by the judges who cited it.
Distinguished
Distinguished by Pennsylvania State Employees Credit Union v. Fifth Third Bank, 398 F. Supp. 2d 317 (2005)
164 Pa.Cmwlth. 453, 643 A.2d 757, are factually distinguishable.
The opinion
*476 KELLEY, Judge
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent.
I would recognize the claim of the petitioner as arising from the breach of contract theory.