Opinion

Hess v. Gebhard & Co., Inc.

2001 Pa. Super. 65
769 A.2d 1186
2001 Pa. Super. LEXIS 201

Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Filed: Mar 2, 2001
Status: Published
Author: Elliott
On the bench: Popovich, Elliott, Brosky
Cited by: 10 cases
Authority: More cited than 10.2%

Reversed on other grounds by Hess v. Gebhard & Co. Inc., 570 Pa. 148 (2002)

recognizing the validity of a restrictive covenant which had been assigned by the former employer who had a continuing interest via the subsequent employer in enforcing the covenant

How later courts described this case

recognizing the validity of a restrictive covenant which had been assigned by the former employer who had a continuing interest via the subsequent employer in enforcing the covenant

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

FORD ELLIOTT, J.,

dissenting:

¶ 1 I respectfully dissent. I am unable to distinguish All-Pak, Inc. v. Johnston, 694 A.2d 347 (Pa.Super.1997), as does the majority.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.