Opinion

Galvin v. Occidental Life Insurance Co. of California

  • 206 Pa. Super. 61
  • 211 A.2d 120
  • 1965 Pa. Super. LEXIS 761
Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Jun 17, 1965
Status
Published
Author
Hoffman
On the bench
Ervin, Wright, Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman
Cited by
20 cases

The opinion

Dissenting Opinion by

Hoffman, J.:

I am not convinced that the parties so clearly expressed their intention to include accidental death claims under the heading of disability insurance, thereby enlarging the definition of the word disability. In my opinion, an insurance contract which contains such an ambiguity should be construed most strongly against the company which drafted it.

Jacobs, J., joins in this dissenting opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.