Opinion

Armco Advanced Materials Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

  • 535 Pa. 108
  • 634 A.2d 207
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Nov 24, 1993
Status
Published
On the bench
Nix, Flaherty, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy, Montemuro, Larsen
Cited by
10 cases
Authority
More cited than 76.4%

"The Congressional intent of the avoided cost pricing scheme is to make the utilities' ratepayers economically indifferent between utility power plant additions and utility purchases of [qualifying facility] power."

How later courts described this case

  • "The Congressional intent of the avoided cost pricing scheme is to make the utilities' ratepayers economically indifferent between utility power plant additions and utility purchases of [qualifying facility] power."

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Prior Report: 135 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 15, 579 A.2d 1337 .

Order affirmed.

NIX, C.J., and CAPPY and MONTEMURO, JJ., affirm.

*110 FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ., affirm in part and would reverse in part.

PAPADAKOS, J., files a concurring and dissenting opinion in which FLAHERTY and ZAPPALA, JJ., join.

LARSEN, J., did not participate in the decision of this case.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.