Opinion

Egan v. Mele

  • 535 Pa. 201
  • 634 A.2d 1074
  • 1993 Pa. LEXIS 249
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Nov 8, 1993
Status
Published
Author
Papadakos
On the bench
Nix, Flaherty, Zappal, Papadakos, Cappy, Larsen, Montemuro, Zappala
Cited by
9 cases

vacating order of Commonwealth Court because only Supreme Court has juris diction of appeals from final orders of courts of common pleas involving right to public office

How later courts described this case

  • vacating order of Commonwealth Court because only Supreme Court has juris diction of appeals from final orders of courts of common pleas involving right to public office

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

PAPADAKOS, Justice,

dissenting.

I have read the erudite opinion of the majority and I remain unconvinced that one, not an elector, who cannot serve if elected, should be permitted to clutter up the ballot with his or her candidacy. I reiterate that if you can’t serve, you can’t run! We should recognize frivolity and deal with it accordingly.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.