Opinion

In Re LaRussa

  • 464 Pa. 86
  • 346 A.2d 32
  • 1975 Pa. LEXIS 1035
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Oct 3, 1975
Status
Published
Author
Manderino
On the bench
Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 10.2%

The opinion

MANDERINO, Justice

(dissenting).

I dissent. I cannot agree with the view expressed by the majority that strict construction of the Act is inappropriate. Strict construction of legislation is the only appropriate standard when a citizen’s freedom is sought to be curtailed. I would affirm the order of the Superior Court for the reasons contained in the Superior Court’s opinion. See In re January, 1974, Special Investigating Grand Jury, 231 Pa.Super. 395 , 332 A.2d 534 (1975).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.