Opinion

Farley v. United States

  • 694 A.2d 887
  • 1997 D.C. App. LEXIS 113
  • 1997 WL 290158
Court
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Filed
May 22, 1997
Status
Published
Author
King
On the bench
Terry, King, Ruiz
Cited by
16 cases
Authority
More cited than 10.2%

remanding the record for a hearing and determination of whether a certain document was Brady material

How later courts described this case

  • remanding the record for a hearing and determination of whether a certain document was Brady material
  • exculpatory evidence under Brady

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

KING, Associate Judge,

concurring in the result:

Because the possible relevance of the complaint filed by Miles with the Civilian Complaint Review Board was first raised by appellate counsel 1 in the brief on appeal, there is nothing in the record relating to the question of whether that complaint might be producible under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). Therefore, I do not object either to a remand to permit an appropriate record to be made *891 on that point or to a direction to the trial court to appoint new counsel.

. The same counsel also represented appellant in the D.C.Code § 23-110 hearing.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.