Opinion

Commonwealth v. Shadron

  • 471 Pa. 461
  • 370 A.2d 697
  • 1977 Pa. LEXIS 604
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Feb 28, 1977
Status
Published
Author
Manderino
On the bench
Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino
Cited by
15 cases

vacating judgment of sentence for felony murder when trial court failed to instruct jury on elements of either felony underlying the charge

How later courts described this case

  • vacating judgment of sentence for felony murder when trial court failed to instruct jury on elements of either felony underlying the charge
  • “Although the Standard Jury Instruction project may provide a helpful [g]uide to trial judges, the standards are [n]ot conclusive. The suggestions contained in the drafts are always subject to challenge by attorneys in their advocacy before this Court.”
  • concurring opinion by Manderino, J.

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

MANDERINO, Justice,

concurring.

I concur in the majority’s grant of a new trial solely because of the trial court’s failure to charge the jury on the elements of burglary and robbery.

I would also like to comment on the majority’s citation in footnote nine to the “Pennsylvania Standard Jury Instructions, Criminal Subcommittee Drafts § 15, 2502B(3).” Although the Standard Jury Instruction project may provide a helpful guide to trial judges, the standards are not conclusive. The suggestions contained in the drafts are always subject to challenge by attorneys in their advocacy before this Court.

NIX, J., joins in this concurring opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.