“objections to venue are jurisdictional and orders relating thereto are appealable under the Act of 1925.”
How later courts described this case
- “objections to venue are jurisdictional and orders relating thereto are appealable under the Act of 1925.”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Concurring Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts:
While I concur in the majority’s conclusion that this interlocutory order is appealable under the Act of 1925, I do so because I feel that, since Pa. R.C.P. 1112 goes to the power of the various courts of common pleas to entertain actions in quo warranto, it is more a rule of “jurisdiction” than of “venue.” Not all objections to “venue” are similarly appealable. Caplan v. Keystone Weaving Mills, 431 Pa. 407 , 246 A. 2d 384 (1968).