Opinion

Shapiro v. United States

  • 69 F. Supp. 205
  • 107 Ct. Cl. 650
Court
United States Court of Claims
Filed
Jan 6, 1947
Status
Published
Author
Whaley
On the bench
Whaley, Littleton, Whitaker, Jones, Madden
Cited by
50 cases
Authority
More cited than 10.1%

The opinion

WHALEY,

Chief Justice (dissenting).

The Court of Claims has no appellate jurisdiction to set aside the verdict of a military tribunal which has been approved by the President as required by statute. Unless the verdict of the military court is set aside, the plaintiff can not recover.

The only appellate jurisdiction the Court of Claims has is under Part 3, Section 412(a) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946, 28 U.S.C.A. § 933 (a). [Public No. 601]

The cases cited in the majority opinion, United States v. Brown, 206 U.S. 240 , 27 S.Ct. 620 , 51 L.Ed. 1046 ; and Runkle v. United States, 122 U.S. 543 , 7 S.Ct. 1141 , 30 L.Ed. 1167 , are inapposite. In neither case was the court martial proceeding approved by the Secretary of War or the President as required by the statute. The President approved the sentence of the court in the instant case. The plaintiff was subsequently pardoned by the President at the request of the Secretary of War.

Plaintiff’s redress, if any, is to the Congress. In my opinion the demurrer should be sustained.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.