Opinion

DiLoreto v. Board of Education

  • 87 Cal. Rptr. 2d 791
  • 74 Cal. App. 4th 267
  • 99 Daily Journal DAR 8473
  • 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6665
  • 1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 756
Court
California Court of Appeal
Filed
Aug 17, 1999
Status
Published
Author
Zebrowski
On the bench
Nott, Zebrowski, Mallano
Cited by
7 cases

The opinion

ZEBROWSKI, J., Concurring.

Respondents acted properly even if the posting of appellant’s sign would not have violated the establishment clause. The baseball field was not a public forum for religious proselytizing. The school was not required to expend funds litigating the issue against whoever might choose to sue.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.