noting a possible conflict in the decisions of this Court on this intent requirement
How later courts described this case
- noting a possible conflict in the decisions of this Court on this intent requirement
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
M. J. Kelly, J.,
dissents with regard to the intentional nuisance count for reasons stated in his opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part in Landry v Detroit, 143 Mich App 16, 26 ; 371 NW2d 466 (1985), lv gtd 424 Mich 876 (1986).
*621 He concurs with the majority’s finding that the circuit court erred in granting summary disposition as to the trespass count.