Opinion

State v. Trott

  • 338 N.W.2d 248
  • 1983 Minn. LEXIS 1294
Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Filed
Sep 16, 1983
Status
Published
Author
Scott
On the bench
Kelley, Amdahl, Scott
Cited by
136 cases

holding that plea colloquy, complaint, and photographs of the victim’s injuries established a sufficient factual basis because the “defendant, by his plea of guilty, in effect judicially admitted the allegations contained in the complaint.”

How later courts described this case

  • holding that plea colloquy, complaint, and photographs of the victim’s injuries established a sufficient factual basis because the “defendant, by his plea of guilty, in effect judicially admitted the allegations contained in the complaint.”
  • concluding that a defendant’s plea had a sufficient factual basis because, in part, the record contained a copy of the complaint, and the defendant in effect judicially admitted to the allegations in the complaint by pleading guilty
  • stating that the defendant’s assertion that defense counsel promised him probation was negated by the record and that “[c]learly, therefore, the trial court was justified in finding that no such promise had been made
  • stating that “[o]ther possible benefits of the accuracy requirement include assisting the court in determining whether the plea is intelligently entered and facilitating the rehabilitation of 6 the defendant”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

SCOTT, Justice

(dissenting).

I join in the dissent of Chief Justice Am-dahl.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.