Opinion

Waschak v. Moffat

  • 379 Pa. 441
  • 109 A.2d 310
  • 54 A.L.R. 2d 748
  • 1954 Pa. LEXIS 371
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Nov 8, 1954
Status
Published
Author
Jones
On the bench
Stern, Stearne, Jones, Bell, Chidsey, Musmanno
Cited by
37 cases

homeowners’ property invaded by gas emitted from neighboring coal mine

How later courts described this case

  • homeowners’ property invaded by gas emitted from neighboring coal mine
  • adopting Section 822 to determine private nuisance liability

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Dissenting Opinion by

Me. Justice Jones:

I dissent. The majority opinion works a denial of the plaintiffs’ right to a day in court on a material and crucial issue of fact.

On the majority’s ratio decidendi (which was broached for the first time by defendants’ counsel in the Superior Court and which that court rejected), the plaintiffs are at least entitled to an opportunity to litigate what has now become an essentially controlling issue of fact as to whether the defendants’ conduct which caused the damage was intentional.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.