"Not only are we persuaded that Quern does not hold that a state is not a § 1983 'person,’ but we find within the Quern opinion some evidence that the state in fact is such a person”
How later courts described this case
- "Not only are we persuaded that Quern does not hold that a state is not a § 1983 'person,’ but we find within the Quern opinion some evidence that the state in fact is such a person”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
N. J. Kaufman, J.
(concurring). I concur separately in the well-written opinion of Presiding Judge Wahls, based on Ross v Consumers Power Co (On Rehearing), 420 Mich 567 ; 363 NW2d 641 (1985).