Distinguished
Distinguished by Commonwealth v. Wyeth Laboratories, 12 Pa. Commw. 227 (1974)
However, the facts of McOune and Herring are distinguishable from the instant case in every important aspect.
The opinion
Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eagen :
I must dissent.
The findings of fact in the court below are founded upon substantial testimony. It is not for us to pass upon the credibility of the witnesses or to determine the weight to be given the testimony: Shydlinski v. Vogl, 406 Pa. 534 , 179 A. 2d 240 (1962). A reading of the record will disclose that the Majority accept as gospel truth the testimony offered on behalf of the *136 plaintiff and completely ignores the evidence offered in contradiction. This is beyond onr function.
Moreover, I am convinced that the defendant has utilized all reasonable means to conduct its business in a manner that will prevent annoyance and damage to the plaintiff and others in the neighborhood. This is all it is required to do under the law. See, Ebur v. Alloy Metal Wire Co., 304 Pa. 177 , 155 A. 280 (1931); and, Hannum v. Gruber, 346 Pa. 417 , 31 A. 2d 99 (1943).