Opinion

Occidental Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Venco Partnership

  • 206 Neb. 469
  • 293 N.W.2d 843
  • 1980 Neb. LEXIS 877
Court
Nebraska Supreme Court
Filed
Jun 17, 1980
Status
Published
Author
Clinton
On the bench
Krivosha, Boslaugh, McCown, Clinton, Brodkey, White, Hastings
Cited by
54 cases

"An examination of the law pertaining to restraints on alienation makes it clear that a 'due-on-sale' clause is not a restraint on alienation and cannot be so considered for any purpose, theoretical or practical."

How later courts described this case

  • "An examination of the law pertaining to restraints on alienation makes it clear that a 'due-on-sale' clause is not a restraint on alienation and cannot be so considered for any purpose, theoretical or practical."
  • the due-on-sale clause is an important device to balance portfolio return with cost of money, ensuring survival of lending associations

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Clinton, J.,

concurring.

I concur in the general holding that a “due on sale” clause, such as is contained in the mortgage in this case, is not an invalid restraint on alienation. The opinion contains considerable dicta and arguments from analogy, concerning the full import of which I am uncertain. I, therefore, limit my concurrence.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.