finding that limitations period for actions to recover the reasonable value of services rendered is six years
How later courts described this case
- finding that limitations period for actions to recover the reasonable value of services rendered is six years
- explaining six-year statute of limitations applies to actions to recover value of services rendered
- the six-year statute of limitations applies for actions to recover for the "reasonable value of the services rendered"
Written by the judges who cited it.
Distinguished
Distinguished by Lavin v. Hackensack Bd. of Ed., 178 N.J. Super. 221 (1981)
In holding that petitioner's claim was no different from any cause of action grounded in contract, the State Board principally relied upon Miller v. Hudson County Freeholders Bd., 10 N.J. 398 (1952), a case which Lavin claims is distinguishable.
The opinion
William J. Beehnah, J.
(dissenting). I dissent and would affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division for the *416 reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Eastwood for that 'court, 16 N. J. Super. 457 (App. Div. 1951).
Heher, J., concurs in this dissent.
■ For reversal — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Oliphant, Wachenfeld and Burling — -4.
For affirmance — -Justices Heher and Brennan — 2.