Opinion

Carlson v. Assessment Appeals Board I

  • 167 Cal. App. 3d 1004
  • 213 Cal. Rptr. 555
  • 1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 2040
Court
California Court of Appeal
Filed
May 3, 1985
Status
Published
Author
Panelli
On the bench
Agliano, Panelli
Cited by
22 cases

deed restriction ignored; separate legal interests in property do not affect manner of assessment, therefore "it is not the profitableness of the property to the present owner" that is relevant so long as property itself has value

How later courts described this case

  • deed restriction ignored; separate legal interests in property do not affect manner of assessment, therefore "it is not the profitableness of the property to the present owner" that is relevant so long as property itself has value

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

PANELLI, P. J.

I concur in the judgment because I believe the Assessor was correct in his assessment of value based on a proper consideration of comparable properties. However, I concur specially because I believe the majority opinion’s holding concerning the effect of valid deed restrictions is too broad and not essential to the resolution of this matter.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.