Opinion

Miller v. Police Board

  • 38 Ill. App. 3d 894
  • 349 N.E.2d 544
  • 1976 Ill. App. LEXIS 3641
Court
Appellate Court of Illinois
Filed
Jun 21, 1976
Status
Published
Author
Simon
On the bench
Burke, Simon
Cited by
29 cases

Chicago police officer held to have violated residency rule requiring him to reside in Chicago; although his declared intent was to reside in Chicago, his acts and interests in Villa Park manifested that his permanent residence was indeed that outside suburb

How later courts described this case

  • Chicago police officer held to have violated residency rule requiring him to reside in Chicago; although his declared intent was to reside in Chicago, his acts and interests in Villa Park manifested that his permanent residence was indeed that outside suburb
  • "In order to have one's residence in a certain place one must both establish a physical presence there and have the intent to make that location his permanent residence ."

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Mr. JUSTICE SIMON, dissenting:

I dissent. For the reasons set forth in the petition for rehearing and those stated in my dissenting opinion, I would allow a rehearing.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.